Image:Stromatolites.jpg|right|thumbnail|250px|
Pre-Cambrian stromatolites in the Siyeh Formation,
Glacier National Park. In 2002, William Schopf of
UCLA published a paper in the
scientific journal Nature arguing that geological formations such as this possess 3.5
Ga (billion years old)
fossilized cyanobacteria microbes. If true, they would be evidence of the earliest known
life on earth.
In the
natural sciences,
abiogenesis is the study of how
life on Earth could have arisen from inanimate matter. It should not be confused with
evolution, which is the study of how groups of living things change over time. Most
amino acids, often called "the building blocks of life", can form via natural chemical reactions unrelated to life, as demonstrated in the
Miller–Urey experiment and similar experiments, which involved simulating the conditions of the early Earth. In all living things, these amino acids are organized into
proteins, and the construction of these proteins is mediated by
nucleic acids. Which of these organic molecules first arose and how they formed the first life is the focus of abiogenesis.
The first living things on Earth are thought to be
single cell prokaryotes (which lack a cell nucleus), perhaps evolved from
protobionts (organic molecules surrounded by a membrane-like structure). The oldest ancient fossil microbe-like objects are dated to be 3.5
Ga (billion years old), approximately one billion years after the formation of the Earth itself. By 2.4 Ga, the ratio of stable
isotopes of
carbon,
iron and
sulfur shows the action of living things on inorganic minerals and sediments and molecular biomarkers indicate
photosynthesis, demonstrating that life on Earth was widespread by this time.
On the other hand, the exact sequence of chemical events that led to the first nucleic acids is not known. Several hypotheses about
early life have been proposed, most notably the
iron-sulfur world theory (
metabolism without
genetics) and the
RNA world hypothesis (RNA life-forms).
Comments